Scale vs Rf

Citation :: Q: Could I get an explanation on the resists and absorption for armor and how they affect the damage? For example in Hibernia Scale armor is vulnerable to slash type and has an absorption of 27% while Reinforced is resistant to slash and has an absorption of 19%.

I read at one point that if armor is vulnerable then it gains a 10% increase in damage while resistant has a 10%. Lets assume you are hit by a slash weapon for a base of 100 damage. I am reading that to mean that in Scale you would take 110 points but in reinforced you would take 90 points. Now I am hazy on how the absorption comes into play. Does that mean in scale your damage would be reduced by 27%? And does it apply before or after the modified damage based off of the resistance/vulnerability.

Say you were getting damaged for 100 points if you were wearing scale would you only be taking 73 points and if you were wearing reinforced you would be taking 81?

I do understand that there are also other factors for damage, but I am wondering how these come into play. Please explain for the confused.

A: This one went to Code Ed to look up. Here’s his reply: ”The two armor effects being discussed work almost exactly as described. If you're wearing scale armor, damage done to you will have a 27% reduction applied to it and if that damage is slash the damage will have an increase (in this case 10%) applied to it. The only difference is when they are applied. The base armor absorb is applied right up front (with a bazillion other factors). Then an additional bazillion factors are applied. Afterwards, the armor vs. weapon type is applied. In short, the armor's base absorb is applied to the base damage, the armor's vulnerability is applied to the modified damage.”

Je ferai une réponse constructive quand on me l'aura traduit :p

du blabla qui se resume à ca...
Q : l'absorption s'applique t'elle avant la vulnérabilité ?
R : oui

tout ceci pour savoir si RF > ecaille dans le cas d'un dégat tranchant (ce que l'ont sait deja)

Une question plutot debile en somme puisque peu importe si tu applique l'un ou l'autre avant tu obtiendra le meme resultat

donc pour une base de domage de 100
Cas1:
- tu commence par absorber une partie des dégats soit un domage de 81 pour RF et 73 pour ecaille
- ensuite tu applique la vulnérabilité de l'armure sur les dégats modifiés pour obtenir le domage final, soit 81-10%= 72.9 pour RF et 73+10%= 80.3 pour ecaille

OU

Cas2:
- tu commence par appliquer la vunérabilité , soit degats de 90 pour RF et 110 pour ecaille
- puis tu absorbe, soit 90-19%= 72.9 pour RF et 110-27%= 80.3 pour ecaille

La question à poser plutot cest : Ces 2 parametres sont ils les seuls à intervenir dans le calcul des dégats recus?
Apparement non, d'autre soit disant facteurs viennent s'ajouter mais on en sait pas plus... Bref, en tout cas là , rien ne fait avancer le débat
Osef quoi.

ouki doki

Forsakken a écrit:: ouki doki

c'est constructif ca ? cheese